IAC Negative Voting Junk Brain Most Weird-Corrupt Idea

March04, 2013

Dear countrymen,

In my earlier messages yesterday I had explained ‘Our Problems Are Economic’ and not political. When per capita income of 900m people is less than $365 compared to over $40,000 for developed countries, India is not going to make any progress, few will get super rich. Honestly GOI shall be required to invest all the tax revenue for their Education, Food, Healthcare, Fuel, Water, Sanitation service etc.

Negative Voting Junk Brained Most Weird-Corrupt Idea

We have seen Junk Brained ideas like ‘Recall of Candidates’ hammered over the last decade but not serious effort was made to Project Capable Candidates – as run up to 2009 elections few IITians formed a Political Party Bharat Punarnirman Dal that could secure just 421 Votes in New Delhi Lok Sabha seat – 0.03% votes or not even 10% of IIT Delhi IIT staff.

1. Term Of Elected Offices Reduced to Four Years

It would have been far better if we had insisted on reducing Term Of Offices of Parliament and State Assemblies from 5 years to 4 years or technically compulsory recall after 4 years. ‘This Is Exactly Like Recall of Candidate Option After 4 Years – all Winners to Seek Fresh Mandate from people within 4 years.’

Countrymen Delhi is a City State and all works and services are executed by Chief Minister led ministers and Municipalities, Union Government control Police and DDA, and have Cantonment Area.

In Delhi with this arrangement in 16 years Delhi will get instead of three Elections for Lok Sabha, 8 for Rajya Sabha, 3 each elections for Assembly and Municipal Corporations, 4 Lok Sabha, 12 Plus Rajya Sabha elections, 4 each for Assemble and Municipal Elections.

Negative Voting Most Weird and Politically Immature

It is clear from the message Negative Voting is targeted against ‘Ruling MPs only’ when actually all works are executed by Chief Ministers and to some extent Municipalities and for our poor infrastructure Contractors, Corrupt Engineers, Quality Control Departments are almost entirely responsible.

2. Rajya Sabha MPs should Resign on Ruling Party Losing Assembly Elections.

Recently BJP lost Elections to Himachal and Uttarkhand Elections but Rajya Sabha Members of Parliament from these states had not resigned on moral grounds. When BJP was in majority it was entitled to Two out of Three Seats but had 5 Rajya Sabha MPs, After losing these two states BJP is in minority hence ought have surrendered 3 out of 5 seats it holds post assemble losses.

http://164.100.47.5/Newmembers/memberstatewise.aspx

S.No	Name	Party	State
1	Nadda, Shri Jagat Prakash	BJP	Himachal Pradesh
2	Shanta Kumar, Shri	BJP	Himachal Pradesh
3	Sood, Smt. Bimla Kashyap	BJP	Himachal Pradesh

S.No	Name	Party	State
1	Koshyari, Shri Bhagat Singh	BJP	Uttarakhand
2	Mahra, Shri Mahendra Singh	INC	Uttarakhand
3	Tarun Vijay, Shri	BJP	Uttarakhand

3. Ex. Ministers Barred From Contesting Elections & Parliament Committees

Ken Lay of ENRON was held accountable for frauds not any secretary of the government. Here every thing is blamed on Prime Minister, as pointed out also in following paras Public Accounts Committee and Finance Committee were chaired by MM Joshi and Yashwant Sinha who had direct access to all the documents and they actually created the ‘Loop Holes or Opened Flood Gates for Corrupt Corporate’. So they Connived With Loots Earlier now Guard Public Resources.

Why can’t we have rules implemented through Supreme Court that bar ex Cabinet Ministers from Chairing Parliamentary Committees on losing the Majority in Elections? This alone will make sure ‘Dubious Politicians are Excluded from Parliamentary Committee Chairs.’

But what is not understood here is that main Ruling and Opposition Party jointly run GOI. Public Accounts and Finance Committees are Chaired by MM Joshi and Yashwant Sinha who were earlier in NDA rule were Cabinet Ministers to have allocated 25 Oil & Gas Offshore Blocks to RIL, 2G, WLL, ILD, ISD, DTH, Optic Fiber, Broad Band all IT services, Petroleum Refineries, Pipelines, Petro-chemicals, Power Generation, Distribution, Transmission, Trading, Retail, Textiles, also let RIL and few others families hold over 50% equity while reducing small investor holdings to below 10%, and also allowed Profit Making Companies to declare just 1% of revenue as dividend and 0.1% going in to account of small investors.

4. ‘Restrict Two Terms as Prime Minister/Cabinet Ministers’

LK Advani is in active National Politics for 60 years had contested over 15-20 times for Parliament. On Losing Lok Sabha They Enter Parliament through Rajya Sabha. This clearly abuse of Democracy and Constitution.

Similarly it may be alright for an MP wining an election and then get installed as Chief Minister of some state and contest State Assemble elections.

5.  Cooling Off For Losers in Elections

But it is grossly illegal for a Loser in any election to contest another election for 5 years. Why can’t Election Commission debar candidates who have lost an election losing deposit to contest an election within five years? Cooling off period for other in top three could be 2,3 and 4 years as per rank 2,3 and 4 in election.

6.  ‘Doctrine of No Demotion’

Why can’t there is restriction on contesting elections – I had in the past proposed a ‘Doctrine of No Demotion’

LK Advani & AB Vajpayee were appointed Prime Minister/ Cabinet Minister Four Times and lost Office Four times – Thrice defeated in parliament (Lost Confidence of Majority) and 2004 elections. (1977, 1996, 1998 and 1999)

They were keen to form government Fifth time in 2004 and 2009 Elections as is given in BJP manifestos, on not getting Majority ready to sit in opposition as ordinary MP.

Many others with BJP since that time is in main opposition had been Chairing as Leaders of Opposition and Parliamentary Committee Members.

However a loser in State Assembly Election Be Eligible for Parliamentary Elections subject to Cooling Off Period.

7.  KURSI PAKADS - BIGGEST SOURCE OF CORRUPTION – Financial & Political

Not letting younger and better qualified to lead in politics since 1977 is worst form of Financial & Political Corruption.

Yashwant Sinha and other BJP leaders in 1998-2004 cabinets had never questioned loot of Reliance as an example.

With such over 35 years of Parliamentary Experience BJP had not won majority even once – are presently reduced to 115 seats yet there is no replacement with younger and better qualified leaders.

For Corruptionfree and Progressindia We Need Above Political Reforms.

THESE REFORMS ARE DESIRABLE TO CLEAN UP POLITICS ALONG WITH ECONOMIC REFORMS.

Thank you,

Ravinder Singh*,

Inventor & Consultant

INNOVATIVE TECHNONLOGIES AND PROJECTS

Y-77, Hauz Khas, NewDelhi-110016, India.

e.mail; progressindia008@yahoo.com,

Ravinder Singh* is a WIPO awarded inventor specializing in Power, Transportation, Water, Energy Saving, Agriculture, Manufacturing, Technologies and Projects.

IAC Message

--- On Mon, 3/4/13, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@gmail.com> wrote:

ACTION: This fraud called "elections"

Dear Members,

Many people ask us why IAC has opted to be "APOLITICAL", and also if IAC supports selection of "good" candidates who will supposedly do "good" things in Parliament which will magically make India into "Golden India" or "Shining India" or "Ram Rajya" etc.

Last year in December I had circulated a summary of the 1972's Nobel Prize in Economics winner's research (Kenneth Arrow) accessible here

http://www.udel.edu/johnmack/frec444/444voting.html

In short, Mr Arrow proved that you can't aggregate individual preferences to define a group preference between multiple options.

So straightaway IAC says that the present Indian system of conducting elections (based in turn on the Westminster model) is a complete fraud and eyewash to ensure that either a dominant party or the next dominant party (in India's case the Congress and the BJP respectively) stick on in power without being obliged to represent the electorate.

Now that the public has begun to see through their game, these scamster parties have come up with another device to fool the citizens - the so-called "Right to Reject" or the 49-O option - which is a "none-of-the above" or "ZERO" option. This essentially means that in, say an election with 4 "serious" candidates for eg. Cong, BJP, Lefitist and a powerful rebel, you end up creating a 5th serious candidate who will split the vote further to ensure that the 2 top parties carry on.

IAC, with its thousands of intelligent members who know basic mathematics and logic at their fingertips, is obviously not going to subscribe or support such patent nonsense. IAC's highest deliberative bodies have been considering this issue for many decades now. We have come to the following conclusion

"If  IAC is to support the present system of voting legislated through the Representation of the People's Act 1951, then the PRESCRIBED mode of voting u/s 59 and elsewhere must include a NEGATIVE vote which will allow the voter to REJECT, ie cast a -1 vote against, a candidate he REJECTS".

To clarify, my present MP is Mr. Ajay Maken;  If 10,000 voters feel Mr. Maken has done no work in the past 5 years, they should be allowed to case 10,000 "-1 vote"s against him, instead of wasting their 10,000 votes over candidates most of whom have no chance of winning.

Here is the essential maths

1) Option 1 (present):  +1 Votes cast = +1 Votes counted => Mr. Ajay Maken wins

2) Option 2 (49-O option): +1 Votes cast = only +1 Votes counted => Mr. Ajay Maken wins

3) Option 3 (IAC's -1): +1 Votes and -1 Votes cast = ZERO effective votes counted => Mr. Ajay Maken LOSES and the "good" candidate with no negative,-1 votes wins.

Please take the time to understand this very carefully, all it needs is a change in the RULE. Please also don't be confused with those who will try to equate a -1 REJECT vote with a ZERO vote, they are not at all the same thing, and the ruling parties will be wetting themselves if this comes through.

I shall take up the second question of "good" candidates in detail next. But, its not enough to have good candidates, you also need a -1 vote

Sarbajit