"There
is no indictment of the Prime Minister or the then Finance Minister (P
Chidambaram) in the Supreme Court's judgement. If there is any
indictment it is the 2003 policy (first-come, first-serve) of the NDA
government and we only followed it," he told a press conference shortly
after the Supreme Court judgement on the issue.
The
government will abide by the judgement that spectrum should be
auctioned which, he said, the ministry has done by delinking spectrum
from the licence in 2011 after he took over.
He
said the UPA only followed the policy of the NDA government of FCFS,
which has been declared discriminatory by the apex court.
The BJP, therefore, must apologise to the nation from the nation for causing huge loss to the government.
Asked
about the implications of the judgement on the companies like Telenor
of Norway and Sistema of Russion who have pumped huge money to roll out
services, the minister said any aggrieved corporate can approach the
court for relief.
The
confusion has been removed and clarity has been brought in the sector
and this help in getting investments in the important sector.
While
blaming the NDA for the 2003 policy which the UPA implemented, he
sought to shift blame on irregularities in the manner in which it was
implemented on the then telecom minister A Raja.
"The
Supreme Court has clearly said that the then minister (Raja) did not
heed to the good advice of both Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and the
Finance Ministry," Sibal said.
Sibal said that there was problem in implementation of the policy and "that is why Raja is where he is".
At the same time in reply to questions he denied he was blaming Raja or UPA ally DMK.
"DMK is our valued ally and they will continue to be our valued ally," he said.
Asked
whether Chidambaram was guilty of omission by not preventing the scam,
he said how can he be blamed if there was no time for him to know that
some wrong was being committed.
Asked
whether the FCFS policy, which is also applicable in other sector like
mining, could be impacted by the judgement, the minister said "it could
be."
He, however, said that the government will not pre-empt a revision of the policy in other sectors.
"Why should we pre-empt, there are statutes in other sector, let the Supreme Court strike it down," he said.
From
now it is a new beginning and the nation will attract more investments
in a sector which is crying for the investments since last more than a
year ever since the uncertainties engulfed this sector.
About
losses to the government, he said "there is no question of loss if the
policy (FCFS) is right and if the policy is faulty then you will have to
calculate losses from October 2003 onward when the policy was
implemented."
Asked
what lesson the government has learnt from on Thursday's judgement,
Sibal said "which ever the minister is functioning must consult
everybody... and not commit any irregularity."
No comments:
Post a Comment