Justice TS Thakur – Government Litigation is Poor Governance
February14, 2015 (C) Ravinder Singh ravinderinvent@gmail.com
Justice TS Thakur is ‘Gem of Indian judiciary’. His observations at an
International Event ‘Large number of cases filed by the government,
forcing litigants to go to court, is not good governance. It shows
there is no proper mechanism for screening of cases,’ are Facts and
actually Reflects ‘Gross Incompetence of Executive & Corruption.’
THERE IS SYSTEMATIC & DEEPROOTED EXECUTIVE CORRUPTION & INCOMPETENCE
EVERYWHERE. Three cases of SYSTEMATIC Incompetence are illustrated
here.
http://www.google.co.in/patents/US6459258
Brief Description of General Electric Patent US 6459258 is annexed
Illustrates Hundred Ways A DISHONEST COMPANY CAN MISUSE ‘COMPUTERISED
METERS’ TO RECORD SUBSTANTIALLY MORE READING THAN SUPPLY OF ACTUAL
ENERGY.
There was NEED OF INDEPENDENT METERING ORGANIZATION TO MAINTAIN THESE
COMPTERIZED METERS.
1. Fabricated Theft Cases in Delhi By DISCOMS
http://delhicourts.nic.in/sep05/Archana%20Mathur%20Vs.%20BSES.htm
Justice TS Thakur in 2005 Applied Brakes to ‘Fabricated Theft Cases of
Domestic Consumers in Delhi’, over 100,000 such Fabricate Theft cases
against legal consumers were made – Example: – Archana Mathur vs BRPL
case is ‘World’s Most Corrupt Judgment Full Of Blunders & Most
Erroneous’.
This Independent Expert can find 100 Defects in High Court Order. A
Woman living on Third Floor of DDA Flats and Meter was located in
common box readily accessible to BRPL was framed in ‘Tempering of
Electricity Meter Case When At That Time BRPL Was Taking SURPRISE
READINGS TWICE A MONTH’.
There is no such thing as ‘Poly-carbonate single phase meter’ – these
are ‘Computerized Electricity Meters With Features to Detect Temper,
Maximum Demand, and Operate Correctly Even When Neutral Is
Disconnected or Connected in Reverse But Meter Would Register Forward
Consumption.’
DERC was MOST CORRUPT in this – Load Factor of Geyser and
Air-conditioner working for 60 hours and 100-200 hours out of 8760
hours annually is not even 1% and 2%. But Scandalously HC on
FAULTY/CORRUPTED DERC SUPPLY CODE DIRECTED CONSUMER TO GET 12.6 KW
Load & UPHELD THE FABRICATED THEFT CASE.
http://164.100.72.12/ncdrcrep/judgement/00130808114726924RP291508.htm
2. CORRUPTED DJB Harassing Ex Governor OP Mehra
Ex Governor and Air Force Chief was harassed from 1999 and his Water
Bills were inflated and all his Complaints were Ignored by Corrupt &
Incompetent DJB Top Officers.
DJB Officers Didn’t EVEN OBEY District Consumer Forum and State
Commission Orders and went in Appeal Against them to the National
Commission.
“Compensation of Rs.25,000/- has not been granted for any monetary
loss. It has been granted for mental and physical harassment suffered
by the respondent due to deficiency in service committed by the
appellant. The respondent is a senior citizen. His grievances started
in the year 1999. He made complaints/ representations and attended the
meetings with the officials of the appellant, but grievances were not
redressed and rather he was made to pay illegal bills under threat of
disconnection. The defective water meters were ultimately replaced
only in April, 2004. Thus, respondent suffered at the hands of the
appellant for the long period of more than 4 years. The conduct of the
appellant in dealing with the matter in hand cannot be termed less
than callous. Such conduct on the part of a public authority can
cause such mental tension and agony to a law-avoiding citizen, which
cannot be measured in terms of money though same has to be
quantified. In the facts and circumstances of a given case,
compensation is granted to a consumer not only to compensate him for
mental agony etc. suffered by him due to deficiency in service
committed by traders or service providers, but also to spur them to
improve the service in future. The respondent is a retired Air Chief
Marshal and a former Governor of two States. If he could not move the
authorities in the Delhi Jal Board to get his grievances redressed for
a long period, plight of an ordinary citizen can well be imagined”.
http://planningcommission.nic.in/reports/sereport/ser/wjc/wjc_ch1.pdf
3. Hundreds of Water Disputes/PILs in APEX JUDICIARRY
As per 1954 agreement affective 1950 Punjab UP agreement – Punjab was
entitled to draw more than 66% of 13 BCM of Yamuna Waters which is 9
BCM but till date no Major Storage Dam is built on Yamuna River or
Upper Yamuna Basin and over 7 BCM water is lost to sea every year in
absence of Dams to Regulate Floods and Augment Water Supplies during
Winter and Summer Months.
SYL Dispute was Therefore Most Scandalous for Executives to Order
Ravi-Beas Waters in Pathankot & Jammu Region to Supply River Waters to
Districts in Haryana – Karnal, Panipat, Faridabad, Gurgaon Along
Yamuna River and when Extensive WESTERN YAMUNA CANAL network can draw
waters from Yamuna R.
http://www.cwc.gov.in/main/downloads/Annual%20Report%200402%202013-14.pdf
Presently Live Storage of All CWC Monitored Dam is ‘85 important
reservoirs with total live storage of 155.008 BCM were monitored on
weekly basis.’ ‘However, due to various constraints of topography and
uneven distribution over space and time, only about 1121 BCM of the
total annual water potential can be put to beneficial use. This can be
achieved through 690 BCM of utilizable surface water and 431 BCM
through ground water.’
‘India has over 1169 BCM of Water in its Rivers but 84 CWC monitored
Dams normally store 130 BCM of Water on average and 35 BCM of live
storage remain unutilized annually therefore Gross Water Utilization
of River Waters is not even 100 BCM or around 8%. Most states
experience Drought Every Year even as Water is Lost to Sea. Punjab is
allocated 12 MAF/15 BCM water in Indus Rivers – 1.3% of Indian River
Water for 2.4% Population, 3% GDP and 11% Food-grains Production of
India.’
Instead of Fully Utilizing Own Water Storage Potential States Are
Claiming Share in Rivers of Other States i.e. Tamil Nadu Claiming
Share in Ganga R.
30 River Links are proposed when for 9 months Most Rivers Almost Run Dry.
Government of India Must DISMISS Public Servants
Who Are Not Competent to Serve India & Are
Perceived To Be Corrupt And Exposed By Judiciary.
Ravinder Singh, Inventor & Consultant, INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES
No comments:
Post a Comment